Goya's Third of May 1808: The Painting That Reinvented Modern War Imagery
Updated: 6 days ago
In the centre of Goya's Third of May 1808 a man in a white shirt is on his knees. His arms are flung up and out, palms toward the soldiers six feet away. His mouth is open. The soldiers — French infantry under Napoleon's occupying command in Madrid — are a faceless wall of backs and uniforms and raised rifles. They are a fraction of a second from firing. The painting has caught the last instant before the shot. The man is already dead.
This is what war looks like in Goya's painting. Up to this point in European history — through Rubens, Le Brun, David, Gros, every official salon painter of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries — war had looked like something else. War had looked like glory. The Third of May 1808, painted in 1814 in Madrid, is the picture that ended that tradition and started a different one. Everything painters and photographers have done with war imagery since 1814 either argues with this picture or stands on top of it.
What war painting was before Goya
For roughly two hundred years before Goya, the official European war painting was a fixed genre with fixed conventions. The general or king was placed at the centre, on horseback, in clean armour, surrounded by a swirl of secondary figures including dying enemies and grateful allies. The smoke was decorative. The blood was minimal. The dying figures were posed as if quoting classical sculpture, with their wounds carefully placed so as not to disturb the elegant line of the body. War was the occasion for the heroic portrait, and the heroic portrait was the point of the painting.
Antoine-Jean Gros, the official painter of the Napoleonic empire, produced the genre's high point. His Napoleon on the Battlefield of Eylau (1808) shows the emperor on horseback after the battle, gloved hand extended in clemency over the wounded enemy. The painting is over five metres tall and nearly eight metres wide. The dying are arranged in tasteful diagonals. The colour palette is warm. The atmosphere is religious — Napoleon is presented as a kind of merciful Christ figure pacifying the dead. The painting was a state commission and it did exactly what the commission wanted: it sold the war as a moral achievement.
Goya knew this tradition. He had spent the early part of his career as a court painter in Madrid producing portraits of the Spanish royal family in exactly the same official register. The Spanish royal family was the dynasty Napoleon's army was now invading on the streets outside Goya's window. The Third of May was painted in direct knowledge of, and in direct refusal of, everything painters like Gros had done with war.
The event
On the second of May 1808, the people of Madrid rose against the French occupation. The uprising lasted a day. On the third of May, the French army responded by rounding up Spaniards across the city — including bystanders, citizens, anyone caught in the wrong street — and shooting them in groups at several locations on the outskirts of town. The estimates of the dead range from four hundred to several thousand, depending on the source. The reprisals continued for days. The Spanish War of Independence that followed lasted six years and killed several hundred thousand people. It was the first modern guerrilla war.
Goya was sixty-two years old in 1808, almost completely deaf, and living in Madrid. He did not paint the Third of May at the time. He waited six years, painted it in 1814 immediately after the French withdrew and the Bourbon monarchy was restored, and submitted it — together with its companion painting The Second of May 1808, which shows the uprising itself — to the new Spanish government as a documentary record of the war. The government accepted the paintings but did not display them. The Third of May spent most of the nineteenth century in storage.
What Goya changed
Almost everything about the conventions of war painting is inverted in the Third of May. The painting has no hero. The central figure is not a general but a civilian — possibly a labourer, certainly not a soldier — and he is not surviving. He is, in the next half-second of the painted timeline, going to be dead. There is no horse. There is no clean armour. There is no diagonal of triumph. There is no clemency.
The faceless French soldiers are painted as a single rigid mechanical line, their faces hidden by their shakos. Goya gives them no individuality. They are not heroes; they are not even villains; they are an apparatus for killing. The light source — a square stable lantern on the ground between the two groups — illuminates only the victims. The soldiers stand in their own shadow. The painter is forcing the viewer's eye onto the dead and the about-to-be-dead. There is no other place to look.
The central white-shirted figure is positioned with his arms raised in a pose that any European viewer in 1814 would have recognised immediately: it is the pose of Christ on the cross. Goya is quoting Christian crucifixion iconography and applying it to a Spanish day labourer being shot by a foreign army for nothing. The reference is deliberate and confrontational. He is not saying the victim was a saint. He is saying the killing was the same kind of killing — pointless, official, sanctified by no one in any way that matters. The Christ pose is one of the most aggressive uses of religious imagery in the entire history of European painting.
The Disasters of War
In parallel with the Third of May, Goya produced a series of eighty-two etchings between 1810 and 1820 that he titled The Disasters of War. The series was not published in his lifetime. The plates were too unflinching for the official Spanish government to accept and Goya knew it. The Disasters etchings were sold to the Spanish Academy of Fine Arts in 1863, thirty-five years after his death, and finally printed for public circulation in 1864.
The Disasters of War show what the Third of May implies. They are small black-and-white prints — each plate roughly fifteen by twenty centimetres — and they show, plate by plate, what the French army and the Spanish army and the local guerrillas did to each other and to civilians across six years of war. Bodies hanging from trees, mass graves being dug, women being assaulted, soldiers looting dead bodies for clothing, children starving in occupied Madrid. The titles Goya wrote underneath each plate are deadpan and corrosive: This I saw. This too. I saw it. And this too. Esto es peor: This is worse.
Together, the Third of May 1808 and the Disasters of War make Goya the first European artist to look directly at war and refuse to dress the picture up. The Romantic painters of the next generation in France — Géricault, Delacroix — knew the work and absorbed it. Photography arrived in 1839 with a similar mission: to document, not to celebrate. Goya is the painter who clears the ground for what photography became.
Manet's Maximilian
In 1867 the French puppet emperor of Mexico, Archduke Maximilian of Austria, was captured by Mexican republican forces and executed by firing squad alongside two of his generals. The execution was reported across Europe within weeks. In Paris, Édouard Manet — then thirty-five, recently scandalous for the Olympia and the Déjeuner sur l'herbe — read the news, looked at the engravings, and decided to paint it. He was looking, very deliberately, at Goya's Third of May.
Manet painted the Execution of Emperor Maximilian three times between 1867 and 1869 — once in Boston, once in Mannheim, once in London — and each version is built on the Third of May's structure. The firing squad is on the right, the victim group on the left, the rifles raised, the puff of smoke from the barrels just visible. The compositions quote Goya so directly that Manet's contemporaries recognised the homage immediately. What Manet added was Goya's deadpan: there is no Christ pose, no upraised arms, no theatre. Maximilian and his generals stand calmly at the wall and wait. Manet has stripped the heroic gesture out of even the victim. The figure has nothing to do but die.
The French government refused to allow the painting to be exhibited at the Paris Salon — the executioners are wearing French-style uniforms, which made the painting an embarrassment for Napoleon III, whose adventure in Mexico the execution had ended. Manet sold the painting privately. The London version is now in a London collection; the Boston version in Boston; the Mannheim version in Germany. The painting was understood at the time as a political act in the Goya tradition, and that is how it has been read since.
The line to Guernica and to photography
Pablo Picasso painted Guernica in 1937 in response to the German Luftwaffe's bombing of the Basque town of Guernica during the Spanish Civil War. Guernica is the most famous anti-war painting of the twentieth century, and it is built directly on Goya's grammar — the lit-from-below light source, the screaming central female figure with her arms raised in a Christ-quoting gesture, the dead horse and the dead child, the absolute refusal of heroic posture. Picasso saw the Third of May in the same Madrid royal collection where it had hung since the late nineteenth century. He knew exactly what he was inheriting.
By the time photography became the dominant medium of war documentation — Roger Fenton's Crimean photographs from 1855, Mathew Brady's American Civil War photographs from the 1860s, Robert Capa's Spanish Civil War photographs from the 1930s — the conventions of war imagery had shifted permanently. The photographs that move people are now the photographs that do what Goya did: refuse the heroic frame, show the dead as ordinary bodies, show the killers as anonymous, light the scene from a low source. Goya invented this grammar in a single painting in 1814. Every war photograph that means anything since works inside it.
Why the painting still matters
There are two reasons the Third of May continues to be one of the most important pictures in the Spanish royal collection. The first is technical: it is one of the strongest compositions in European painting, with a light source, a colour palette, and a figural arrangement that solve the problem of how to make the eye stay on the painful part of an image without flinching away. The second is political: in a culture that still has not stopped making war, the painting still has a job to do. Every time a state argues that its violence is heroic, the Third of May is in the room reminding the viewer that the dead are individual people in white shirts, on their knees, with their arms in the air, and that nothing about the killing makes them not.
Goya did not see the painting hang in his lifetime. It was returned to storage by the restored Bourbon monarchy almost immediately and only became a public picture in the late nineteenth century. He died in 1828 in exile in Bordeaux, after the political climate in Spain turned against him. He never saw Manet, or photography, or Guernica. The painting did its work without him, and is still doing it.
Key takeaways
Goya's Third of May 1808 (1814) ended the convention of the heroic war painting and invented the modern image of senseless violence. Every serious war painting since works inside its grammar.
The painting inverts the conventions of the official Napoleonic war picture — exemplified by Antoine-Jean Gros's Napoleon on the Battlefield of Eylau (1808) — by removing the hero, anonymising the killers, illuminating only the victims, and quoting Christian crucifixion imagery for a civilian execution.
Goya's Disasters of War (1810-20, published 1863) is the parallel print project that documents the same war in unflinching detail. The plates were too direct for the restored Spanish government to allow public circulation in Goya's lifetime.
Édouard Manet's Execution of Emperor Maximilian (1868-69) is the most direct nineteenth-century descendant of the Third of May. Manet copied the composition deliberately and stripped the heroic gesture out of even the victim.
Pablo Picasso's Guernica (1937) extends the same grammar into the twentieth century. The lit-from-below light source, the Christ-pose, the anonymous killers, and the refusal of heroic framing all trace back through Manet to Goya.
The conventions of war photography — refusing the heroic frame, showing the dead as ordinary, showing the killers as anonymous — were established by Goya in painting before photography existed. He invented the visual grammar that documentary war photography still uses.
Browse Goya and Spanish painting prints in the archive at zocineartdesign.etsy.com.
New in the Journal: Manet's Olympia and the Painting That Broke Polite Painting
New in the Journal: Picasso's Guernica and How a Single Painting Argues Against War
New in the Journal: William Blake in 8 Visions: God, Newton, and the Red Dragon
Comments