top of page

Post-Impressionism: Van Gogh, Cézanne, Gauguin and What Came After Monet

Around 1886 — the year of the eighth and last Impressionist exhibition in Paris — a small group of painters who had grown up admiring Monet and Pissarro began, separately and without coordination, to do something different. They kept the Impressionist breakthroughs (broken brushwork, pure colour straight from the tube, outdoor light) and threw out the Impressionist project (the optical record of a moment). They asked instead what painting could do that photography could not.

The answer they collectively arrived at — through Vincent van Gogh in Arles, Paul Cézanne in Aix, Paul Gauguin in Brittany and Tahiti, Georges Seurat in Paris — is what the British critic Roger Fry in 1910 called Post-Impressionism. The name stuck. It covers about twenty-five years of painting, c.1886 to c.1910, and it is the bridge from the nineteenth-century French academy to twentieth-century Modernism.

Vincent van Gogh, The Bedroom in Arles, 1888
Vincent van Gogh, The Bedroom in Arles (1888). Pure colour, simplified perspective, emotional content as composition.

What Impressionism had achieved, and where it had stopped

Impressionism had won. By 1880 Monet, Pissarro, Renoir, Degas, and Berthe Morisot had collectively forced the Paris art world to accept that broken brushwork and high-key colour could carry serious painting. The objection that Impressionism was unfinished, sketchy, or unable to depict serious subjects had quietly evaporated. Read the dedicated essay on Impressionism's 1874 exhibition for the founding moment.

But Impressionism had also painted itself into a corner. If the entire goal is the optical record of a passing moment, the painter has nowhere to go once the camera arrives. By 1885 photography was already capturing motion (Muybridge's horse studies, 1878) and high-key colour (early autochromes, 1903). The next generation of serious painters could see the dead-end coming.


Cézanne — structure under the colour

Paul Cézanne, Mont Sainte-Victoire
Paul Cézanne, Mont Sainte-Victoire. The mountain near Aix-en-Provence, painted sixty times. Structure first, colour second.

Paul Cézanne worked in near-isolation in Aix-en-Provence in southern France from the 1880s until his death in 1906. He painted Mont Sainte-Victoire, the mountain east of his studio, sixty times. He painted apples on a kitchen table for thirty years. The work has the same look across that whole period: blocky planes of colour built up in patient cross-hatch strokes, perspective slightly off, every form pushed back toward its underlying geometric solid.

Cézanne's famous instruction to a younger painter — to treat nature as cylinder, sphere, and cone — is the entire programme of Cubism telegraphed twenty years early. Picasso and Braque both said they could not have done what they did without Cézanne. The bridge from Monet to Picasso runs through this one painter in a studio in Aix.


Van Gogh — colour as emotion

Van Gogh, Wheat Field with Cypresses, 1889
Vincent van Gogh, Wheat Field with Cypresses (1889). Painted at the asylum at Saint-Rémy — the cypresses as living vertical brushstrokes.

Vincent van Gogh painted seriously for about ten years, from 1880 to his death in 1890. Almost everything we associate with him — the Starry Night, the Sunflowers, the Bedroom in Arles, the wheat fields, the self-portraits, the cypresses, the olive groves — was made in the last four years of his life, between his arrival in Arles in 1888 and his death in Auvers in 1890.

What he added to Impressionism was emotional content as composition. The brushwork in a Van Gogh is not optical (the way Monet's is); it is expressive. The wheat moves because the painter is moving. The cypress is on fire because the painter saw the cypress on fire. The colour is not what the eye sees but what the mind sees through the eye. Twentieth-century Expressionism — Munch, Nolde, Kirchner — descends from Van Gogh directly.


Gauguin — flatness and the elsewhere

Paul Gauguin, Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going? (1897)
Paul Gauguin, Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going? (1897). Painted in Tahiti — flat planes of colour, no Western perspective.

Paul Gauguin began as a Parisian stockbroker, took up painting in the 1870s as a hobby, lost his job in the 1882 crash, and turned to painting full-time. He spent the rest of his life moving away from Paris — first to Pont-Aven in Brittany, then to Martinique, then twice to Tahiti and the Marquesas, where he died in 1903. The paintings from the Tahitian years are his canonical work.

Gauguin's contribution to Post-Impressionism is the flat plane of colour outlined in a dark contour, with European perspective abandoned in favour of something closer to a Japanese print or a medieval stained-glass window. He called the technique Synthetism. Matisse, the Fauves, and the German Expressionists all took it as a founding example. The Modernist refusal of three-dimensional space starts here.


Seurat — the science of dots

Georges Seurat developed pointillism — building an entire painting from small dots of pure unmixed colour that the eye blends at viewing distance — between 1884 and his early death in 1891 at thirty-one. His large painting A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte (1884-86) is the canonical work of the technique. Henri-Edmond Cross, Paul Signac, and others continued the divisionist project into the 1890s.

Seurat's contribution is the most explicitly scientific of all the Post-Impressionist programmes. He read contemporary colour theory closely, structured his palettes around complementary pairs, and treated painting almost as an experiment. The technique has been admired more than imitated; it requires patience that almost no painter after Seurat has been willing to commit.


Why the movement matters

Almost every twentieth-century modernist programme starts in one of these four painters. Cubism in Cézanne. Expressionism in Van Gogh. Fauvism and the flatness of Matisse in Gauguin. The various scientific abstractions (Mondrian, the Bauhaus colour theorists) in Seurat. The Post-Impressionists are not a coherent movement — they did not exhibit together, they did not share a manifesto, several of them never met. But they collectively dismantled the late-nineteenth-century European convention of painting as optical record, and made the entire twentieth-century vocabulary available.


Key takeaways

  • Post-Impressionism (c.1886–1910) is the period between Impressionism and Modernism, named retroactively by Roger Fry in 1910.

  • Four anchor painters: Cézanne (structural), Van Gogh (emotional), Gauguin (flatness), Seurat (scientific).

  • None of them met as a movement; they worked separately, in some cases in deliberate isolation (Cézanne in Aix, Gauguin in Tahiti).

  • Each of them solved a different problem that Impressionism had created — what painting can do that photography cannot.

  • Almost every major early-twentieth-century modernist movement starts in one of these four painters: Cubism (Cézanne), Expressionism (Van Gogh), Fauvism (Gauguin), the Bauhaus (Seurat).


Browse Post-Impressionist prints in the archive at zocineartdesign.etsy.com.

Comments


bottom of page